Skip to content

Ralf Gründer

My feedback

8 results found

  1. 464 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Gründer commented  · 

    Ergänzend noch ein erklärendes Beispiel:
    Derzeit wandern die Lohnpositionen alle einfach als "Facharbeiter (Geselle)" in die aus der NaKa erzeugte Rechnung hinein. Dadurch ist z.B. für den Kunden nicht ersichtlich, an wlechem Tag und von wem die Leistung erbracht wurde Die Informationen selbst sind allerdings in der IST-Spalte der NaKa ersichtlich. Statt einfach nur die Bezeichnung der Lohngruppe als Positionetext herzunehmen, wäre es interessant zusätzlich eine Auswahl treffen zu können, ob zusätzlich auch das Leistungsdatum und der Mitarbeitername in der Positionebezeichnung mit aufgeführt werden sollen. Idealerweise sollte man das dann auch noch kumulieren können (siehe auch den Eintrag "Identische Positionen kumulieren").

    Ralf Gründer shared this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ralf Gründer supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ralf Gründer commented  · 

    Wir haben dieses Problem ebenfalls, nur im Modul NaKa in Kombination mit aus der Zeiterfassung übergebenen Zeiten. Diese werden uns alle als Einzelpositionen mit Namen der Lohngruppe quer durcheinander in der Rechnung ausgegeben (bspw. 10x "Facharbeiter Geselle" als Einzelposition mit teilweise 2 Std., teilweise 0,5 Std, etc., statt das Ganze zu einer einzelnen Position "Facharbeiter Geselle" zusammenzuaddieren). Insofern schließen wir uns dem Wunsch nach einer solchen Funktion an.

  4. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ralf Gründer supported this idea  · 
  5. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ralf Gründer supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ralf Gründer supported this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ralf Gründer supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ralf Gründer supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base